Home Blood Alcohol Content Harmful Effects Machine Testing Helpful Links Advertise
 
  

North Dakota

CHAPTER 39-08
REGULATIONS GOVERNING OPERATORS


39-08-01. Persons under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any other drugs orsubstances not to operate vehicle - Penalty.


1. A person may not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle upon a highway or upon public or private areas to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use in this state if any of the following apply:


a. That person has an alcohol concentration of at least eight one-hundredths of one percent by weight at the time of the performance of a chemical test within two hours after the driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle.


b. That person is under the influence of intoxicating liquor.


c. That person is under the influence of any drug or substance or combination of drugs or substances to a degree which renders that person incapable of safely driving.


d. That person is under the combined influence of alcohol and any other drugs or substances to a degree which renders that person incapable of safely driving. The fact that any person charged with violating this section is or has been legally entitled to use alcohol or other drugs or substances is not a defense against any charge for violating this section, unless a drug which predominately caused impairment was used only as directed or cautioned by a practitioner who legally prescribed or dispensed the drug to that person.


2. A person violating this section or equivalent ordinance is guilty of a class B misdemeanor for the first or second offense in a five-year period, of a class A misdemeanor for a third offense in a five-year period, of a class A misdemeanor for the fourth offense in a seven-year period, and of a class C felony for a fifth or subsequent offense in a seven-year period. The minimum penalty for violating this section is as provided in subsection 4. The court shall take judicial notice of the fact that an offense would be a subsequent offense if indicated by the records of the director or may make a subsequent offense finding based on other evidence.


3. Upon conviction of a second or subsequent offense within five years under this section or equivalent ordinance, the court must order the motor vehicle number plates of all of the motor vehicles owned and operated by the offender at the time of the offense to be impounded for the duration of the period of suspension or revocation of the offender's driving privilege by the licensing authority. The impounded number plates must be sent to the director who must retain them for the period of suspension or revocation, subject to their disposition by the court. The court may make an exception to this subsection, on an individual basis, to avoid undue hardship to an individual who is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life, including a family member of the convicted individual and a coowner of the motor vehicle, but not including the offender.


4. A person convicted of violating this section, or an equivalent ordinance, must be sentenced in accordance with this subsection. For purposes of this subsection, unless the context otherwise requires, "drug court program" means a district court-supervised treatment program approved by the supreme court which combines judicial supervision with alcohol and drug testing and chemical addiction treatment in a licensed treatment program. The supreme court may adopt rules, including rules of procedure, for drug courts and the drug court program.


a. For a first offense, the sentence must include both a fine of at least two
hundred fifty dollars and an order for addiction evaluation by an appropriate licensed addiction treatment program.


b. For a second offense within five years, the sentence must include at least five days' imprisonment or placement in a minimum security facility, of which forty-eight hours must be served consecutively, or thirty days' community service; a fine of at least five hundred dollars; and an order for addiction evaluation by an appropriate licensed addiction treatment program.


c. For a third offense within five years, the sentence must include at least sixty days' imprisonment or placement in a minimum security facility, of which forty-eight hours must be served consecutively; a fine of one thousand dollars; and an order for addiction evaluation by an appropriate licensed addiction treatment program.


d. For a fourth or subsequent offense within seven years, the sentence must include one hundred eighty days' imprisonment or placement in a minimum security facility, of which forty-eight hours must be served consecutively; a fine of one thousand dollars; and an order for addiction evaluation by an appropriate licensed treatment program.


e. The execution or imposition of sentence under this section may not be
suspended or deferred under subsection 3 or 4 of section 12.1-32-02 for an offense subject to subdivision a or b. If the offense is subject to subdivision c or d, the district court may suspend a sentence, except for ten days' imprisonment, under subsection 3 or 4 of section 12.1-32-02 on the condition that the defendant first undergo and complete an evaluation for alcohol and substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation. If the defendant is found to be in need of alcohol and substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation, the district court may order the defendant placed under the supervision and management of the department of corrections and rehabilitation and is subject to the conditions of probation under section 12.1-32-07. The district court shall require the defendant to complete alcohol and substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation under the direction of the drug court program as a condition of probation in accordance with rules adopted by the supreme court. If the district
court finds that a defendant has failed to undergo an evaluation or complete treatment or has violated any condition of probation, the district court shall revoke the defendant's probation and shall sentence the defendant in accordance with this subsection.


f. For purposes of this section, conviction of an offense under a law or ordinance of another state which is equivalent to this section must be considered a prior offense if such offense was committed within the time limitations specified in this subsection.


g. If the penalty mandated by this section includes imprisonment or placement upon conviction of a violation of this section or equivalent ordinance, and if an addiction evaluation has indicated that the defendant needs treatment, the court may order the defendant to undergo treatment at an appropriate licensed addiction treatment program and the time spent by the defendant in the treatment must be credited as a portion of a sentence of imprisonment or placement under this section.


5. As used in subdivision b of subsection 4, the term "imprisonment" includes house arrest. As a condition of house arrest, a defendant may not consume alcoholic beverages. The house arrest must include a program of electronic home detention in which the defendant is tested at least twice daily for the consumption of alcohol. The defendant shall defray all costs associated with the electronic home detention. This subsection does not apply to individuals committed to or under the supervision and management of the department of corrections and rehabilitation.

 


39-08-01.1. Prior offenses.

For purposes of this chapter, chapter 39-06.1, and chapter 39-20 a previous conviction does not include any prior violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance if the offense occurred prior to July 1, 1981.

 


39-08-01.2. Special punishment for causing injury or death while operating avehicle while under the influence of alcohol.


1. The penalty provided in this section applies when:

a. A person is convicted of an offense under chapter 12.1-16 and the conviction is based in part on the evidence of the person's operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs;

b. A person is convicted of violating section 39-08-03 based in part on the
evidence of the person's operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs and the violation caused serious bodily injury, as defined in section 12.1-01-04, to another person; or

c. A person is convicted of violating section 39-08-01 and the violation caused serious bodily injury, as defined in section 12.1-01-04, to another person.

2. If the defendant was at least eighteen years of age at the time of the offense under chapter 12.1-16, the sentence under that chapter must be at least one year's imprisonment. If the defendant was at least eighteen years of age at the time of the violation of section 39-08-01 or 39-08-03, the sentence under either section must be at least ninety days' imprisonment. The sentence under chapter 12.1-16 or section 39-08-01 or 39-08-03 may not be suspended unless the court finds that manifest
injustice would result from imposition of the sentence. The sentence must be served in its entirety, without benefit of parole or pardon.


3. If the defendant was less than eighteen years of age at the time of the offense, the punishment may be in accordance with subsection 2 or chapter 27-20.


39-08-01.3. Alcohol-related traffic offenses - Ignition interlock devices and theseizure, forfeiture, and sale of motor vehicles.

A motor vehicle owned and operated by a person upon a highway or upon public or private areas to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use may be seized, forfeited, and sold or otherwise disposed of pursuant to an order of the court at the time of sentencing if the person is in violation of section 39-08-01 or an equivalent ordinance and has been convicted of violating section 39-08-01 or an equivalent ordinance at least one other time within the five years preceding the violation. The court may
also require that an ignition interlock device be installed in the person's vehicle for a period of time that the court deems appropriate.

 


39-08-01.4. Driving while under the influence of alcohol while being accompaniedby a minor - Penalty.

It is a class A misdemeanor for an individual who is at least twenty-one
years of age to violate section 39-08-01 if the violation occurred while a minor was accompanying the individual in a motor vehicle.

 


39-08-02. Person conveying passengers not to engage drivers addicted tointoxicants - Penalty.

No person owning or having the direction or control of any vehicle for the
conveyance of passengers in this state may employ or continue in the person's employment as a driver of such vehicle any person who is known to the actor to be addicted to a controlled substance or given to the excessive use of controlled substances or intoxicating liquors. Any
person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of an infraction and is liable for all damages sustained by reason of such violation.

 

 

More Information:

 

Request a Lawyer

  North Dakota DOT


 

DWI Notes for North Dakota (ND)

Driving while intoxicated known as DWI, DUI (driving under the influence) or OUI (operating under the influence) is a serious offense in North Dakota. Losing your license to operate a vehicle in ND is just one of the penalties. It is in your best interest to hire an experienced criminal defense attorney to handle your case. A lawyer who specializes in drunken driving cases will be able to defend your constitutional rights. The field sobriety tests, the breathalyzer or Alcotest blood alcohol content (BAC) readings may be flawed and could result in a not guilty verdict in court. Only an experienced DWI lawyer will know how these tests should be administered and whether they were performed according to the guidelines provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Standardized Field Sobriety Testing

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has created a set of Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST). These three tests have to be administered and evaluated in a standardized manner to obtain accurate indicators of impairment. Most police officers fail to administer these tests correctly. Your DWI attorney may be able to challenge the validity of the stop and arrest by reading the report submitted by the police officer or trooper or by the testimony provided in court.

The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests were developed from research sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). NHTSA then developed a training regimen for law enforcement officers to provide a consistent way of evaluating the results from DWI suspects. Although police officers use a variety of tests when they pull someone over for suspected driving under the influence of alcohol, the three that are NHTSA accepted are:

  • Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus
  • Walk and Turn
  • One Leg Stand

Other tests, like counting backwards or saying the alphabet from one letter to another have not been proven to be reliable indicators of being intoxicated or under the influence. Keep in mind that even the reliable tests must be administered correctly for them to be valid indicators of DWI.
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Testing

The horizontal gaze nystagmus test checks if you have involuntary twitching of the eyeball. This occurs naturally as the eyes gaze at a right angle towards the side. When someone is under the influence of alcohol, nystagmus (twitching of the eyeballs) occurs at lesser angles. During this test, the officer will have the subject follow a pen or light with his eyes. The officer must observe the subject eyes. The three indicators that the officer looks for in each eye are:

  • If the subject is smoothly following of the moving object with his/her eyes
  • If the eye begins to jerk distinctly at the maximum range (right angle)
  • If the angle of jerking begins within 45 degrees of center

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has determined that if between both eyes, four or more indicators are present the subject is probably under the influence. This test is therefore allowed for the purpose of making a DWI/DUI arrest and requiring a breath test at the police station.


Walk & Turn and One Leg Stand Tests

The other two tests that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration believes are accurate predictors of DWI are the so called, “divided attention” tests. These tests can supposedly be done by most sober people. Although many police officers will tell you that they hear people say, “I can’t do that when I’m sober.” (By the way, this is not the wisest thing to say if you are a DWI suspect.) According to NHTSA, suspects cannot usually follow instructions and perform physical tests when they are impaired.

Walk & Turn

In the Walk & Turn test, the police officer will ask the DWI suspect to take nine steps placing the heel to the toe in a straight line. Someone suspected of DWI should follow instructions carefully for this test. The seven indicators of failure in the walk and turn are:

  • Failure to maintain balance while listening to instructions
  • Starting before the instructions are completely stated
  • Stopping while walking to regain balance
  • Lack of heel to toe touching
  • Using arms to regain or maintain balance
  • Loss of balance while turning
  • Taking an incorrect number of steps

NHTSA research indicates that the majority of DUI suspects who fail two or more of the above items are operating under the influence. You will be arrested and charged with DUI/DWI and required to provide a breath sample.

One Leg Stand

The one leg stand test requires the DWI suspect to stand with one foot approximately six inches off the ground and count aloud starting with one thousand and increasing by one (one thousand-one, one thousand-two, one thousand three, etc…) until told to lower the foot by the police officer. The officer is required to time the subject for 30 seconds. The four indicators of DWI impairment are:

  • Swaying while balancing
  • Using arms to balance
  • Hopping to maintain balance
  • Placing the foot down

NHTSA research indicates that the majority of DWI suspects who exhibit two or more of these indicators are under the influence.

Probable Cause

The field tests that are administered on the side of the road are used by police officers to establish probable cause for the arrest. Your DWI attorney may be able to challenge these tests as well as the reason you were stopped in the first place. In order for these tests to yield valid results they have to be administered in the proscribed manner and must be evaluated based on a total number of indicators. The more indicators are present, the more likely that the person is operating under the influence.

Because most people charged with DWI do not understand what these tests are looking for or how they should be administered, it is extremely important that a lawyer that specializes in DWI defense be used to examine all the evidence and provide a recommendation on how to proceed.

Designed and Hosted by Alonso Consulting, Inc.

   

 

 
 
DUI Books at Amazon

Copyright © 2007-2008 Alonso Consulting, Inc. – All Rights Reserved.
Duplication of the content, design or navigation of this site is forbidden and is the exclusive property of the copyright holder.

Listings in this site are either free or paid attorney advertisements. They have not been tested or endorsed by any organization including the publisher of this site. Do not send any incriminating or confidential information to this site, since there is no attorney-client privilege.